The Impact of Peer Evaluation on the Quality of nursing report

akbari farmad, somayeh; pour heydari, shahnaz

doi:10.22088/mededj.9.1.7

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Articles archive

For Authors

Reviewers Section

Registration

Contact us

Site Facilities

Indexing

Ethics

In-press Articles

Search in website

Receive site information

Volume 9, Issue 1 (2-2021)

mededj 2021, 9(1): 7-17

Back to browse issues page

The Impact of Peer Evaluation on the Quality of nursing report

Somayeh Akbari farmad ^*

, Shahnaz Pour heydari

shahid beheshti university of medical sciences

Abstract: (2920 Views)

Background and Objective: Peer evaluation has been introduced as a control method and part of nursing quality assurance programs. Peer evaluation is the process by which nurses systematically review, control, and judge the quality of nursing care relative to occupational standards. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of peer evaluation on the quality of nursing reports of evaluated nurses in the surgical wards of Kamali Educational and Medical Center in 2019.
Methods: This study is a quasi-experimental interventional study before and after. The research tool is a standard checklist for examining the quality of nursing reports and the study population includes all nurses working in a surgery ward of Kamali Hospital in Karaj with at least two months of experience in this ward. To evaluate the effect of the intervention, the method of registering the evaluated nurses before and after the intervention is evaluated by the researcher.
Findings: In this study, 30 nurses (women) participated and 60 checklists were completed by the researcher to review the files registered by the evaluating nurses in surgery ward one, before and after the intervention, and a total of 180 files with standard checklists. The quality of registration in the Cardex and reporting was checked. The results showed that the status of compliance with the principles of reporting (Z = -4.838 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed): <0.001) as well as the status of compliance with the principles of registration in Cardex and Pharmacy Card (Z = -4.253 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)) : <0.001) Improved.

Conclusion: Peer evaluation can be used as an effective training method along with other continuing staff training programs to improve the nursing registration and reporting process.

Keywords: peer evaluation, nursing care quality, nurse, reporting

Full-Text [PDF 841 kb] (1543 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/03/17 | Accepted: 2020/10/31 | Published: 2021/03/15

References

1. Ammenwerth E et al (2001). Nursing process documentation systems in clinical routine–prerequisites and experiences. International Journal of Medical Informatics

2. College of Respiratory Therapists of Ontario (2005). Professional Practice Guideline Documentation. Toronto Sp

3. Mashoofi, M, Amani, F, Rostami, KH, Mardi, and A.Evaluation Information Record in Hospitals Ardabil Medical Science 2001, Research and Scientific Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Science, 2004, 3(11): 44-49

4. Khoddam H et al (2002). Effectiveness of continual education on quality of nursing records. Journal of Medical Sciences. 3 (8) 65 – 69

5. Moloney R Maggs C (1999). A systemic review of the relationships between written manual nursing cares planning rkapoJoAN

6. Hajavi, A, Sarbaz, M, Moradi, N.Medical Recording, and Tehran: Nashr Electronici VA Etelarasani Jahan Rayane, First, 2003. 239-240

7. Navuluri RB (2002). Documentation: What W, When, Where, Who, and How. Available in., research.com. WG

8. Stetina, P, Groves, M, Pafford, L. Managing Medication Errors-a Qualitative Study, Medsurg Nurs, 2005, 14(3):174-8

9. azimi L, markazimoghaddam N, Rostami K, Talebi A, Eskandari A, Mirzaiy A et al . Assessing the Physicians' Order Errors in Medical Records and its effective Factors (A Case Study). Jhosp. 2016; 15 (2):41-48

10. Sharifian, R, Ghazisaeedi, M. Information registration in surgical special sheets for Discharege patients in Tehran University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospitals,Payvand of Tehran University of Medical Science,2008, 31-39:2(1)

11. Zare Fazlollahi, z, Koshkalam Aghdam, M, Lotfnezhad Afshar, H, Jabraili, M. The Rate of Adherence to Principles of Diagnosis Recording in Medical Records of Patients with Fractures Admitted to Urmia Motahari Hospital, Health Information Management, 2011, 8(3): 405-408

12. Rangraz jeddi, F, Farzandipoor, M, Moosavi, and S Gh.Completion rate of data information in emergency record in Kashan's hospitals, Feyz journal of Kashan university of Medical Science, 2004, 8(3): 68-73

13. Lindberg JB et al (1998). Introduction to Nursing. 3rd edition. Lippincott Co

14. Zadeh H. The effect of peer review evaluation on quality of nurse's performance and patient's satisfaction. Iran Journal of Nursing. 2010 Feb; 22(62):8-21

15. https://nursingd.abadanums.ac.ir/portal/home/?60836/%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%85%D9%87%D8%A7-%D9%88-%DA%86%DA%A9-%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA-%D9%87%D8%A7

16. Ghasaby MM, Alavi NM. Quality and barriers against nursing documentation in Kashan Shahid Beheshti Hospital (2011). Modern Care Journal. 2012; 9(4)

17. Young Mi Kim, Fitri Putjuk, Endang Basuki and Adrienne Kols International Family Planning Perspectives Vol. 26, No. 1 (Mar., 2000), pp. 4-12

Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article

‎ 10.22088/mededj.9.1.7

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

akbari farmad S, pour heydari S. The Impact of Peer Evaluation on the Quality of nursing report. mededj 2021; 9 (1) :7-17
URL: http://mededj.ir/article-1-357-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 9, Issue 1 (2-2021)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645